Thursday, January 17, 2013

The Last Cherry Pepsi in the Fridge

To being, let me explain something, my family keeps our 24 packs of Pepsi and such in my mom's van. Not sure why, but it's always been like that. However, my dad more often than not, will bring in a Cherry Pepsi (His favorite) and put it in the fridge to keep it cold. I too love Cherry Pepsi and once again, more often than not, I steal the last Cherry Pepsi from the fridge; and I never seem to want to replace it.
     The question, boils down to in my opinion, that I am just way to lazy to go out to the car to get a Pepsi in the first place. Further, why on Earth would I steal the Pepsi then replace it by going all the way out into the car? At that point I might as well just get off my butt and walk to the garage. It's the convenience factor. Why walk the extra 100 feet when what I want is literally in the next room, already cold and ready to pop open to drink? However, the problem is cyclical in nature. The Pepsi is put into the Fridge, the Pepsi is then taken back out of the fridge, and the process repeats itself. The problem is self evident, and both my father and I loose at some point in the process.

The Cycle of the Pepsi Dilemma

(1).  Father Puts Pepsi in Fridge: He had to walk all the way to the garage to get it.





(2.)  I take the Pepsi out of the Fridge: I capitalize on his work, and end up using the  product that my father worked to obtain.

(3.)  No more Pepsi in the Fridge: If either my Father or I wish to have another Pepsi we must go all the way back into the garage. Thus, I loose I am too lazy to go to the garage. My father looses by having to go to the garage to get another Pepsi

(4.)  Father puts another Pepsi in the Fridge: I forced my dad to go out of the way to get another Pepsi, even though he already had one.

(5.)  I take the Pepsi out of the Fridge: The cycle continues on.

     Now, in abstract thought the Pepsi represents a the good, with my Father and I as the actors. The Fridge is a common pool resource. The Pepsi, in nature, is subtractable ergo If I drink it, my dad cannot. If my Dad drinks it I can not (Of course it can be replenished  which begs the question of controlled common resource pools) but in essence, its original status as an ice cold pop, just begging to be drank, can not be achieved. Once again, in abstract thought assume the restocking of the Pepsi (Maybe a day or so) is equivalent to fishing population rebounding after 10-30 years. Looking at it this way, I may have prevented Population X from being able to consume the Pepsi (Fish) and cause them to die out. Now, in reality this isn't so, but I think this very well exemplifies the problems and the tragedy of common pooled resources.
   

1 comment:

  1. Hi, Jon:

    I thought this was a funny entry and also a thoughtful one. Essentially, you are free-riding on the effort of others in your family when you don't go to the car yourself, right. Your parents are the privileged actor who provide the good upon whose provision you free-ride.

    Your discussion of the nature of the good was convincing and pretty accurate. Common-pool resources don't have to be finite (non-renewable). Like the stock of Pepsi, they can be replenished. The critical question is whether your level of consumption is greater than the rate of replenishment. If you end up exhausting the Pepsi supply on the Tuesday after a weekend shopping trip and there will be no more Pepsi till the next weekend, I would argue that you are over-exploiting!

    My one main critique is that you need to be careful about you writing. Paste your entry into Word and spell check and grammar check before you submit it, being careful to avoid inappropriate capitalization. This is a minor issue in that your content was very good. It's just that, overall, you would be able to communicate your point of view more effectively if these stylistic issues weren't in the way.

    Journal content: 1.6/1.6
    Journal writing quality: 0.15/0.3

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.