Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Ohio Energy's Resources: Project to combat CO2 and Green House Gas Emissions


Ohio has begun to tackle a very serious problem in the world: CO2 emissions and climate change. They’re website: http://www.ohioenergyresources.com/ is the go to site for all information regarding this blog entry. I shall be referring to it frequently, so I will not be citing it.
ALL CONTENT COMES FROM: http://www.ohioenergyresources.com/

Ohio declares three main forms of emissions:
Stationary – Factories, plants, ect…
Mobile – Cars, and non-road vehicals
Area Sources – these are from county-level estimates of heating water or cooling water ect..
Wherein the whole idea of this project is to cover those three sweeping fields and help create a better future. The project goes through 5 tasks to help decide its course of actions. I have already talked about Task 1: Take an inventory of Ohio’s Main Emissions. In this task I believe that Ohio has done a pretty good job.  They have looked at Stationary modes, as well as mobile. Even County-to-County searches at what exactly are emitting CO2.

     Task 2: Look at Federal Policy and how it interacts with Ohio’s policy. In this respect the project took a close look at all aspects of climate change legislation; from Off-Balances in Agriculture to Manufacturing Sectors, and business growth opportunities. In the Off-Balance section (referred to as Chapter 3) the article is about how Ohio is trying to offset what farms are doing (whether it be deforestation or biological carbon pollution) and how farms can also off set the CO2 levels by using something called Carbon Sequestration, or having a lot of trees that can take in the CO2 and release O2 into the air. In the Business Growth Opportunities (referred to as Chapter 7) it tackles the myth that with legislation businesses will fail. It tells us instead that we would be able to invest in markets that are all about being Green! From Advanced Energy to Aerospace and Aviation.
In this aspect Task 2 is very well done. They offer many examples of how Ohio can use such legislature in favor of Ohio businesses as well as CO2 emissions. It offers a broad overview for someone who may not even understand what legislature is, or how it works to effect a state and it’s businesses.

     Task 3: Share the information with the public, investors ect... (Not much to really talk about here)

     Task 4: State Policy Options. In this task we take a look at what exactly Ohio could do to help off-set the CO2 emissions and climate change. Referred to as Chapter 7. It mentions first as the criteria for how the policies would be judged. 1) How directly a policy is targeted at climate change. 2) Locus of author for design, adaptation and implementation. 3) level of resources required from Ohio Government. The chapter then goes forward and discusses different ways to combat climate change. Mostly Taxes and Caps, Green requirements, Standards, and conservation programs.
Once again I think Ohio is doing an excellent job.  It’s very comprehensive. I’ll be honest, I didn’t write out all the information contained within that section, mostly because it was A LOT. Each ‘option’ was then put to the test by the 3 criteria that was offered at the beginning of the chapter. I really don’t think Ohio could do much more with that, they’ve done great so far.

      Task 5: Model Scenarios.  Finally Ohio begins to look at possible scenarios for climate change. Using the data from 1,2,4 The Millennium Institute and The Ohio State University came up with these models. Referred to as Chapter 9. The scenarios go from what exactly the federal government could do, to what the Ohio government could. It calls that Ohio could in fact start placing restrictions on levels of CO2 emissions.

     Now, in this task, well…I don’t think caps and trade work. It just doesn’t. What should make the business want to tell the truth about their emission levels? I mean, if Factory is A is polluting 300tons of CO2 every day, but they really can only pollute 200tons of CO2, which means a cut in production, and perhaps a cut in money. If the factory gets a cut in money…well they’ll have to lay off workers, when they lay off workers people become poor and yadda yadda yaddda. Further, if Ohio alone comes up with these caps, well, other states won’t exactly be holistic. So from state to state it would be completely different. I just think there needs to be more sweeping change. Total reform maybe. I think the federal government needs to pull up their big boy pants and start actually putting real holistic measures on capping emissions. I think once that is done then we can really start looking at the future of emissions.

     All and all I am very happy with this effort. It is very well done and thought out to a T. All the models and forecasts are done precisely and in a real-world effort. I am quite impressed and cannot wait to see if any of these limitations or rules will actually go into effect. I believe this effort isn’t lofty like some are.  The goals aren’t crazy, but very attainable and when goals are attainable and when they want to be met (which I think America/the World is still in a GREEN GREEN GREEN phase) I think Ohio will be successful. Only, however, if they actually stick to this plan; because it’s a GOOD plan.

1 comment:

  1. Hi, Jon:

    Good job -- you hit the mark on this assignment. You identified multiple different routes Ohio is taking to increase sustainability, address climate change, and improve energy efficiency (obviously all of these things are related). You provided specific details and evaluated the sufficiency of these efforts. One thing I would have liked to see is data on some of the results these effort have produced thus far. The content you had was good, though.

    I don't necessarily agree with your argument about cap and trade, but it's not necessarily fair for me to make that point when we haven't discussed the specific details of cap and trade in class (due to the snow day). We may still get the chance and then you might be able to think about this policy option more critically.

    Journal content: 1.6/1.6
    Journal writing quality: 0.2/0.3

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.